Custom made ANSI Class 2, ANSI II, Police Safety Reflective Vests,
Here are a couple examples of what we have done in the past, keep in mind We CUSTOM Make it, so you can have it Made your Way.
ANSI CLASS II Vest With Adjustable Side
ALL our vests can be Made to Meet ANSI CLASS II Requirements Just Contact us for Details
On November 24 2008, a new
federal regulation (23 CFR 634) goes into effect mandating that anyone working
in the right-of-way of a federal-aid highway must be wearing high-visibility
clothing that meets the requirements of ANSI / ISEA 107; 2004 edition class 2 or
3
WE can CUSTOM Make Any Vest you Want the Meets these New Requirements, Contact
us TODAY, Time is Running out, Nov 24 is Coming SOON
On November 24, 2008, a new federal regulation (23 CFR 634) goes into effect
mandating that anyone working in the right-of-way of a federal-aid highway must
be wearing high-visibility clothing that meets the requirements of ANSI / ISEA
107; 2004 edition class 2 or 3. This requirement will apply to all emergency
responders.
The Code of Federal Regulations Title 23 (Highways) Part 634 was originally
published in the Federal Register Vol 71, No 226, pp 67792 - 67800. The Rule
itself (634.3) simply states that:
"All workers within the right-of-way of a Federal-aid highway who are
exposed either to traffic (vehicles using the highway for purposes of travel) or
to construction equipment within the work area shall wear high-visibility safety
apparel."
Definitions (634.2) within Part 634 cover what is meant by "Workers"
and "high-visibility safety apparel". Emergency responders are
included in this definition anytime they are working "within the
right-of-way of a Federal-aid highway" with some exceptions for law
enforcement officers working on an incident involving criminal activity (see
below).
"High-Visibility Safety Apparel" is defined to mean "personal
protective safety clothing that is intended to provide conspicuity during both
daytime and nighttime usage, and that meets the Performance Class 2 or 3
requirements of the ANSI/ISEA 107–2004".
ANSI 207, Public Safety Vests
After 23 CFR 634 was finalized, a new standard for Public Safety Vests was
published as ANSI / ISEA 207; 2006 edition. Because ANSI 207 was not published
until after 23 CFR 634 was finalized, the federal regulation could only
reference ANSI 107.
ANSI 107 requires that class 2 garments (vests) have at least 775 square inches
of high-visibility, fluorescent background material and at least 201 square
inches of reflective material. While the ANSI 207 requirement for reflective
material is the same (201 in2), it requires only 450 square inches of background
material. Therefore, ANSI 207 vests do not meet the requirements of ANSI 107 and
therefore do not currently meet the requirements of 23 CFR 634.
The DOT Federal Highway Administration’s Associate Administrator for
Operations has written a letter to the Emergency Responder Safety Institute that
is being circulated in discussions about this issue. (Click here to download a
copy of the letter.) The letter acknowledges that they have reviewed ANSI 207
and “found this standard compatible with the ANSI/ISEA [107] Class II
requirements for night-time visibility.” Those affected by 23 CFR 634 should
understand that the high-visibility clothing must be worn day and night, so this
statement by the FHWA does not officially validate the use of ANSI 207 vests in
place of ANSI 107 where legally mandated.
Proposed Changes to the Rule
The DOT/FHWA has proposed a number of changes that will affect 23 CFR 634. Of
the most immediate concern is that they propose allowing ANSI 207 vests for
emergency responders. This change cannot go into effect in time for the November
24 deadline and is not likely to go into effect until the 2nd or 3rd quarter of
2009. In a much more comprehensive change, the current proposals would
incorporate 23 CFR 634 into the MUTCD (Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices). This would make high-visibility garments (under the proposal, either
107 or 207 certified) mandatory for anyone working on “all roads open to
public travel in accordance with 23 CFR Part 655, not just Federal-aid
highways.”
The proposed changes concerning 23 CFR 634 can be read by downloading a pdf
document of the proposed changes for the MUTCD. The items already mentioned are:
362 (page 317) – incorporation into the MUTCD and extending high-visibility
clothing mandate to all roads
375 & 376 (page 318) – allowing ANSI 207 vests for first responders and
law enforcement personnel.
The proposed changes were open for public review and comment until July 31,
2008. Many individuals and groups concerned with responder safety submitted
their own comments and proposals which will now be reviewed and considered for
inclusion.
Exceptions for Emergency Responders
Due to "comments from State and local police, national police
organizations, and State DOTs" the original publishment in the federal
register includes exceptions for law enforcement officers working in potentially
adversarial or confrontational roles. This includes traffic stops and searches.
Officers are still required under 23 CFR 634 to wear high-visibility clothing
during other times, such as "directing traffic, investigating crashes, and
handling lane closures, obstructed roadways, and disasters within the
right-of-way of a Federal-aid highway." (The language for this exception
can be found in the 2nd column of page 67797 of the publication in the Federal
Register Vol. 71, No 226 which can be downloaded using the link below)
Currently no such exception exists for firefighters. Some fire service personnel
have expressed concern about the idea of adding a layer of potentially flammable
material between their turnout gear and SCBA while battling car fires or during
an extrication. Because those views were not expressed during the comment period
of 23 CFR 634 no exceptions or interpretations for fire service operations were
published along with the rule. Further, all fire department personnel should be
aware that turnout gear alone does not meet the visibility requirement. No
turnout gear currently manufactured meets the color requirement for the
fluorescent background material of these high-visibility garments. Even if
turnout gear could be dyed to meet the color standard when manufactured, it
would likely no longer be compliant after the first exposure to fire, smoke, and
soot. Fire departments should consider fire resistance of materials (and their
limitations) as part of their criteria for selecting vests and writing
department protocols and procedures.
NFPA 1901
Complicating the issue further, the National Fire Protection Association is set
to release the 2009 edition of NFPA 1901: Standard for Automotive Fire
Apparatus. This edition (as written) will apply to all fire apparatus
"contracted for on or after January 1, 2009" and will require
"one traffic safety vest for each seating position, each vest to comply
with ANSI/ISEA 207, Standard for High-Visibility Public Safety Vests, and have a
five-point breakaway feature that includes two at the shoulders, two at the
sides and one at the front." This requirement is included for each type of
fire apparatus, for example see sections 5.8.3 (18), 6.7.3 (15), 7.7.3.1 (14),
etc.
Although some vests can be purchased that are certified to meet the requirements
of both ANSI 107 and 207, vests compliant only with ANSI 207 may not meet a
strict legal interpretation of the 23 CFR 634 requirements scheduled to take
effect in November. This is a potentially confusing liability issue that
deserves close attention by all departments as the deadline approaches.
Summary
Part of the RKB mission is to try to keep our users informed of
equipment-related issues, and we hope that this mission critical hint has
accomplished that. The timing of 23 CFR 634 and ANSI / ISEA 207 was unfortunate,
but the complications are being addressed by the MUTCD proposed changes. The
difficulty and confusion will be in the short term, between the effective date
of 23 CFR 634 on November 24th and the time the proposed changes are
implemented. Every source contacted by the RKB staff has made it clear that the
eventual intent is for either the ANSI 107 or 207 vests to be used. However, no
one has been able to say with certainty what will happen if there is a serious
injury or fatality to a responder wearing a 207-compliant vest while the
unchanged 23 CFR 634 is in effect. That may be decided in court. Departments
should consider getting an opinion from their counsel to assist in deciding
their compliance strategy.
We hope that every department will plan now for this new requirement under 23
CFR 634, and also plan ahead with funding and training for the later changes
that will likely extend the safety-vest requirements to all public roads.
